Peer-Reviewed Articles
Gondal, Neha, and Allison Wigen. 2025. “Professor-Writers and Machinist-Painter-Photographers: Investigating the Duality between Occupational Categories and Artistic Hobbies.” Poetics 110. doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2025.102001
Even though participation in the arts (a.k.a. hobbies) of employed persons has risen steadily since the early twentieth century, research has not systematically explored the relationship between occupations and hobbies. We address this gap by investigating the intersection and cultural co-constitution of these two forms of engagement by drawing on Breiger's influential work on duality. We introduce a machine-learning approach called association-rules to generate a two-mode network comprising occupations and hobbies using data from the Survey of Public Participation in the Arts. Our analysis shows that the relationship between the two constructs is not consistent with the cultural omnivorousness model. Instead, attributes of the two constructs like temporality and degree of collaborativeness shape their association with implications for their cultural significance. Pottery and painting, generally solo hobbies, are associated with most professions, but are the exclusive domain of gendered male, blue-collar occupations that have less autonomy on working hours. Collaborative music hobbies, entailing considerable commitment, on the other hand, are exclusively associated with occupations with such autonomy. Weaving and writing, portable hobbies that have a reputation of being ‘woke,’ are connected to white- and blue-collar sedentary jobs. Sharedness of hobbies and variability in their cultural significance have implications for the erosion and maintenance of cultural and social distance between occupational groups. Degree of collaborativeness, likewise, has implications for connectedness within hobby groups as well as visibility and embeddedness of occupational groups in local communities.
Kibria, Nazli, and Allison Wigen. 2025. “Making Sense of Sibling Economic Gaps: Racialized Meritocratic Frames, Economic Inequalities, and Family Relationships.” American Journal of Cultural Sociology 13(3):517–541. Appeared online 2024. doi.org/10.1057/s41290-024-00232-w
We look at how economically divergent siblings in the United States make sense of their economic gaps, highlighting family relationships as an arena in which economic inequalities are experienced and negotiated. Drawing on over sixty in-depth interviews with a racially diverse sample of predominantly middle-class persons who report themselves to be in better economic circumstances than their sibling(s), we examine “sibling difference stories,” or siblings’ explanatory accounts of their economic divergence. We analyze the integration of cultural discourses of inequality into these stories. Siblings deploy a meritocracy discourse of individual responsibility in conjunction with other cultural frames to make sense of economic gaps. These include “Born that Way,” emphasizing inherent differences of ability, and “Birth Order,” about how siblings of different ages experience family life differently due to their age-based location in family structure and history. The “Institutional Failures” frame, prevalent among racial minority siblings, points to the failure of social institutions and policies to provide needed supports to the sibling lagging in achievement. Black, Latino/a, and biracial informants further situate institutional failures within systemic racism. Our study’s relational approach draws attention to the role of intimacy and emotion in how people make sense of inequality.
Wigen, Allison. 2023. “Negotiating Unequal Exchange: Relational Work in Cross-Class Sibling Relationships.” Sociological Forum 38(1):235–253. Appeared online 2022. doi.org/10.1111/socf.12873
Based on sixty in-depth, semi-structured interviews, this article examines exchanges of support in cross-class adult sibling relationships. Whereas previous studies of family exchange have largely focused on parent–child support and patterns of inequality across families, this study addresses a gap in the literature by focusing on sibling exchanges and within-family inequality. How is support exchanged when expectations of peer equality are violated—when there is an economic difference between adult siblings? I find that cross-class siblings engage in relational work to shape and reframe exchanges in ways that are more indirect, often involving third parties. I identify four types of indirect economic support—proxy support, dependent support, compensatory support, and shared resources—which contribute to our understanding of the dynamics of sibling exchange, and point to ways in which inequality can be interactionally managed.
» Honorable Mention, IPM Robert D. Mare Graduate Paper Award, American Sociological Association
Works in Progress
Wigen, Allison. “Fishermen as Artists: Cultural Production in Times of Change.”
Artmaking has a long tradition in commercial fishing communities. In the nineteenth century, American whalers adorned their journals and logbooks with poetry and illustrations, while sailors practiced scrimshaw, carving intricate designs into shells, walrus tusks, and whalebone. More recently, since 1998, commercial fishermen from across the Pacific and Atlantic coasts have gathered annually in Astoria, Oregon to share their original poetry, storytelling, and songs. This study examines the material conditions of fishermen’s work and artmaking across these two historical periods: the peak of the American whaling industry (1840–1860) and the contemporary U.S. commercial fishing industry (2000–2025). I find that fishermen’s cultural production offers insights into the material conditions of labor in times of social, economic, political, and environmental upheaval, whether during the Industrial Revolution or today’s climate crisis. These findings suggest that nineteenth-century whalers’ art was an instrumental, enterprising, and colonizing project, whereas twenty-first-century commercial fishermen’s art serves as a form of cultural preservation, celebration, stewardship, and resistance. By comparing these historical moments, this study contributes to sociological and historical understandings of culture-making, labor, and the environment by illustrating how the conditions of work shape artistic expression and how laborers respond to shifting social and environmental pressures through cultural production.
Wigen, Allison. “Fisherpoetry as Community-Based Cultural Resistance.”
This paper examines contemporary commercial fishermen’s cultural production as a form of everyday resistance to social and ecological uncertainty. Drawing on 40 in-depth interviews, five weeks of fieldwork in U.S. fishing ports, participant observations at fishermen’s performances and panels, and narrative analysis of fishermen’s artworks, I document how commercial fishing communities translate ecological knowledge and occupational experience into “fisherpoetry”—original stories, songs, and artworks created by commercial fishing communities and shared at the annual Fisherpoets Gathering in Astoria, Oregon. I analyze how fisherpoets use artmaking to narrate, interpret, and reimagine their labor in the face of economic, social, and environmental precarity. I identify four overlapping dimensions of everyday resistance expressed through fisherpoetry: resistance to loss, resistance to erasure, resistance to gender roles, and resistance to climate change. Taken together, I argue that these practices represent a form of community-based cultural resistance: a collective means of resistance by which working people make labor meaningful, through the cultivation of shared spaces and practices.
Wigen, Allison. “Limitations in the Field: On Disability, Reflexivity, and Embodiment in Ethnography.”
Advocates of embodied or carnal ethnography, including Loïc Wacquant and others, argue that researchers must immerse themselves in the physical and social worlds of their participants to the fullest extent possible. This methodological stance privileges procedural or practical knowledge over so-called cerebral or passive knowledge, and assumes that, with enough persistence, any researcher can undertake such immersion despite potential risks. But what happens when the researcher has limitations—physical, cognitive, or emotional—that prevent full participation or immersion? Bridging literature on disability in the academy, reflexivity, and embodiment, I develop a framework of six dimensions that shape how disabled researchers challenge the “imperative” of immersion as they navigate their fields: access, physicality, temporality, disclosure, support, and emotion. Drawing specifically on autoethnographic reflections from my own fieldwork as a researcher with an invisible disability, I show how each dimension forced me to reconsider traditional ethnographic expectations and instead embrace a research approach that accounted for my embodied constraints. Rather than seeing this as a failure of ethnographic rigor, I argue that these limitations generate unique epistemic insights, fostering reflexivity, critical distance, and methodological creativity.
I further critique the binary of “participant-observer” versus “observant-participant,” demonstrating how disabled researchers often occupy a liminal position that preserves analytic distance while remaining relationally engaged. This stance reveals subtleties invisible to both fully immersed and fully detached observers and underscores that immersion alone cannot resolve “insider/outsider” dilemmas. Ultimately, I call for a pluralistic ethnographic practice that treats disability not as a methodological obstacle but as an epistemic resource. Recognizing multiple pathways to knowledge production moves the discipline beyond a universal imperative of embodiment and toward more inclusive, ethically attuned forms of qualitative inquiry.
Wigen, Allison. “The Past, Present, and Uncertain Future of U.S. Craft Occupations.”
The American Arts and Craft movement of the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries arose in reaction to the Industrial Revolution. Proponents of this movement feared that industrialization, resulting in a division of labor between production and design, would lead to the demise of traditional handcrafts in the United States. In the mid-twentieth century, manual skill decline accelerated an “overly pessimistic” view of crafts as dying, which persists today. Recently, the emergence of the digital craft marketplace with websites like Etsy.com has given birth to an “overly optimistic” view that crafts are in fact thriving. This study puts these contradictions into relief, showing that neither narrative on its own is sufficient to explain the present state of crafts and craft occupations in the United States, nor predict their future viability. Taken holistically, these narratives provide a more complicated picture and shed light on changing social meanings and value of crafts and craft occupations.
Public Sociology
Wigen, Allison. “Revolutionary Women in Two Iranian Films: On The Hidden Half (2001) and The House Is Black (1963).” Bright Lights Film Journal, 29 September 2024, https://brightlightsfilm.com/revolutionary-women-in-two-iranian-films-on-the-hidden-half-2001-and-the-house-is-black-1963/.